Laptops and desktops
The bulk of most fleets. Individually small, collectively substantial, and the category where matching the term to the refresh cycle matters most.
Technology is the one class on this site where the asset is worth almost nothing by the end of the term, which changes both the structure that fits and the argument for financing it at all.
Last reviewed 7 September 2026
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$428/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
3 years at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
What it is
IT and technology finance is nominally a secured facility over identified equipment, with the lender registering a security interest on the Personal Property Securities Register. In practice the security does very little work. Recovering forty laptops distributed across a workforce is impractical, and even a clean recovery of a three-year-old fleet realises a small fraction of what it cost.
That has a direct effect on pricing and terms. Lenders in this class are substantially assessing the business rather than the hardware, so indicative rates sit closer to unsecured business lending than to the asset finance bands elsewhere on this site, and terms are shorter because the equipment’s useful life is shorter. Neither of those is unreasonable; they are the honest consequence of what is being financed.
What follows from it is more useful than the rate. Because the equipment will be replaced rather than kept, the structure that fits is often not the one that ends in ownership. An operating lease returning the hardware at the end genuinely solves a problem here, in a way it does not on a forklift that will still be working in fifteen years. And because so much modern technology spend is subscription rather than purchase, a good deal of an IT budget cannot be financed at all and simply has to be paid from operating cash flow.
Common refresh cycle
3 to 4 years
Indicative rate band
11% to 20% p.a.
Residual value
Very low
Registered on
PPSR
By category
Indicative New Zealand purchase bands, illustrative only. Specification, quantity, warranty term and whether equipment is bought or leased all move these considerably. A supplier quote decides an actual purchase.
The bulk of most fleets. Individually small, collectively substantial, and the category where matching the term to the refresh cycle matters most.
On-premise infrastructure. Longer useful life than end-user devices, and increasingly displaced by cloud services that cannot be financed as equipment.
Switches, firewalls, access points and cabling. Cabling is installed into premises and is unrecoverable, which lenders treat like any other fit-out work.
Terminals, printers, cash drawers and scanners. Retail and hospitality hardware with a reasonable working life and a modest used market.
Displays, room systems and control. Installed into meeting spaces, so partly recoverable and partly not, and dating on a display refresh cycle.
Frequently supplied on a click-charge contract rather than bought, which is a separate commitment with its own term and minimum volume.
Licences bought outright can be financed with the hardware. Subscription licensing cannot, and is an operating cost.
Configuration, data migration and professional services. Real project costs that some lenders will include in a facility and others will not.
The common case

The structural question
A business that replaces its laptops every three years and finances them over four spends the fourth year paying for machines that have already been replaced, while also paying for their replacements. Doing that twice puts the business permanently a year behind itself, carrying two facilities where it intended to carry one. This is the most common and most avoidable mistake in technology finance, and it is entirely a matter of arithmetic rather than judgement.
The fix is to decide the refresh cycle first and set the term to match. Where devices are kept four years, a four-year term is right. Where they are replaced at three, the term is three even though a longer term would show a lower weekly figure. The lower figure on the longer term is not a saving; it is the cost of the mismatch, deferred.
This is also the argument for an operating lease in this class specifically. Elsewhere on this site a lease is one structure among several. Here it aligns naturally with what actually happens to the equipment, because the hardware goes back at the end of the term instead of sitting in a cupboard, and the refresh and the facility end on the same day by construction rather than by discipline.
What cannot be financed
A large share of a modern technology budget is subscription rather than capital. Cloud infrastructure, software billed per user per month, security services, backup and connectivity are all operating costs, and none of them can be financed as equipment because nothing is being bought. On many New Zealand IT projects the subscription component now exceeds the hardware component, which means the finance facility covers a minority of the spend. A project budget that shows only the financed portion is showing the smaller half.
Indicative bands
Indicative bands only, and not an offer of credit. Terms here are shorter and rates higher than elsewhere on this site, because the security is genuinely weaker.
| Equipment type | Typical maximum term | Deposit commonly sought | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| End-user devices | 24 to 36 months | 0% to 10% | Terms follow the refresh cycle rather than the physical life, which is longer. |
| Servers and storage | 36 to 48 months | 0% to 15% | Longer useful life supports a longer term, where the business genuinely intends to keep it. |
| Network and cabling | 36 to 48 months | 10% to 20% | Cabling is installed and unrecoverable, so it is treated closer to fit-out work than to equipment. |
| Point of sale and AV | 36 months | 0% to 15% | Reasonable working lives and a modest used market. Installed AV components are discounted. |
| Used or refurbished IT | Rarely financed | Not applicable | Values are too low and fall too fast for a facility to make sense. Commonly bought outright instead. |
Indicative New Zealand market bands for technology finance. Illustrative, not an offer.
The alternatives
Businesses prioritising cash preservation typically finance or lease. Businesses whose need is a capability rather than a device increasingly buy it as a service. The right answer follows what is actually needed.
| Feature | Hire purchase | Operating lease | Buy outright | Move to a service |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who owns it | The business | The lessor | The business | The provider |
| At end of term | Ageing hardware to dispose of | Hardware goes back | Ageing hardware to dispose of | Nothing to dispose of |
| Refresh discipline | Requires it | Built in | Requires it | Built in |
| Upfront cash | Deposit or nil | First month | Full price | None |
| Financeable | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, it is an operating cost |
| Fits when | Hardware will be kept | Hardware will be replaced | Cash is available and cheap | The need is capability, not hardware |
The fourth column is where a growing share of technology spend has gone, and it is not a finance decision at all. Where a cloud service replaces a server, the question stops being how to fund the purchase and becomes whether the operating cost is acceptable.
The process
Written as an observation of what commonly happens rather than as instructions. Every lender differs, and none of this is a guarantee of an outcome.
01
Same week in most cases
A supplier quote separating hardware, perpetual licences, installation and subscription components is what opens the file. That split matters more here than in any other class, because only part of it is financeable and the rest lands on operating cash flow.
Documents commonly required
02
1 to 5 working days
Because the security is weak, assessment rests on trading history and serviceability more than on what is being bought. Twelve months of bank statements and the NZBN cover most applications, with financial statements requested at the larger end.
Documents commonly required
03
Within the assessment window
This is the step worth spending time on. Where the hardware will be replaced at the end, an operating lease returns it and ends cleanly. Where it will be kept, a hire purchase makes more sense. Setting a term longer than the refresh cycle is the decision that causes problems later.
Documents commonly required
04
1 to 3 working days after acceptance
The financier commonly pays the supplier directly and registers its security interest on the PPSR. On a staged rollout, settlement may follow deliveries, and the first payment usually falls a month after the equipment is delivered.
Documents commonly required
Data on equipment being returned at the end of a lease is the business’s responsibility rather than the lessor’s. Secure erasure before return is an obligation worth confirming in the lease terms and planning for, because the return date is fixed and the erasure is not automatic.
Worked scenarios
Illustrative scenarios on stated assumptions. The figures are indicative and are produced by the calculator on this page rather than quoted by any lender.
32 staff, three-year laptop refresh
The firm is replacing its laptop fleet and the hardware comes to $86,000 plus GST, with docking stations and monitors included.
In this scenario an operating lease over 36 months is chosen over a hire purchase, because the fleet will be replaced again at the end and nobody wants forty ageing laptops in a cupboard. The lease and the refresh cycle end on the same day by construction. Secure erasure before return is planned into the changeover rather than discovered at it.
Indicative figures
Six stores, point of sale replacement
The retailer is replacing point of sale hardware across six stores at $52,000 plus GST, alongside a subscription platform billed monthly per till.
On these assumptions a 36-month facility at an indicative 13% carries a repayment near $400 a week on the hardware. The subscription cannot be financed and sits on the operating account, and in this scenario it is comparable in size to the repayment. Budgeting for the financed portion alone would have understated the project by roughly half.
Indicative figures
Replacing an on-premise server
The consultancy’s server is at end of support and the options are a replacement at $38,000 plus GST or a move to cloud infrastructure billed monthly.
In this scenario the decision is not a finance decision. Financing the replacement is straightforward on a 48-month term. Moving to a service removes the capital question entirely and replaces it with an operating cost that never ends. The comparison worth making is the total of four years of finance plus the eventual replacement against four years of subscription, and it is specific to the workload.
Indicative figures
Honest assessment
The market
Editorial only. These are the kinds of provider active in this class, listed to describe the market rather than to recommend any of them. We hold no relationship with those named here.
Best for fleets on a refresh cycle
Specialists in operating leases over end-user devices, including return and disposal at the end of the term. The structure that fits this asset best, and the one banks offer least often.
Best for mixed hardware projects
Non-bank financiers writing hire purchase over technology hardware, commonly at an indicative rate above bank pricing because the security is weak.
Best for larger infrastructure
For substantial server and network projects, standard business lending is frequently simpler and cheaper than asset finance, precisely because the asset adds little security either way.
Best for bundled projects
Resellers frequently arrange finance alongside hardware, sometimes bundling support. Convenient, and the support component is worth reading as a separate commitment.
Names are deliberately generic. A comparison of specific providers would need current pricing we cannot substantiate, and publishing it would be a claim rather than information.
Test the maths
Pre-filled with a mid-size hardware refresh over three years. Remember that any subscription component sits outside this figure. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$428/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
3 years at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
The published source for the depreciation treatment of computer hardware referred to on this page.
The published source for the GST treatment referred to on this page.
The register on which a security interest over technology equipment is recorded.
Backs the note that secure erasure of data before equipment is returned or disposed of is the business’s obligation.
Context for the disposal obligations attaching to technology equipment at end of life.
FAQ
Because the security is genuinely weaker. Recovering distributed end-user devices is impractical, and a recovered three-year-old fleet realises a small fraction of its cost. Lenders in this class are substantially assessing the business rather than the hardware, so indicative pricing sits closer to unsecured business lending than to the asset finance bands elsewhere.
The same length as the refresh cycle. A four-year facility on a three-year fleet means paying for machines already replaced while also paying for their replacements, and doing that twice leaves a business permanently carrying two facilities where it intended to carry one. A longer term shows a lower weekly figure and is not a saving.
For equipment that will be replaced rather than kept, an operating lease does something a hire purchase cannot, because the hardware goes back at the end and the refresh and the facility end on the same day by construction. For a server the business intends to run for five years, a hire purchase ending in ownership makes more sense.
Perpetual licences bought outright can usually be financed alongside the hardware, because something is actually being purchased. Subscription software billed per user per month cannot, because nothing is bought. On many New Zealand projects the subscription component now exceeds the hardware, so a facility covers a minority of the spend.
No. Cloud infrastructure is an operating cost rather than a capital purchase, so there is no asset to secure and nothing to finance. Where a cloud service replaces a server, the question stops being how to fund a purchase and becomes whether an ongoing operating cost is acceptable, which is a different decision entirely.
Rarely, and it is usually not worth pursuing. Values are low and fall quickly, so the facility costs more to arrange than the security is worth. Refurbished hardware is more commonly bought outright, which avoids both the arrangement cost and the term-matching problem.
Under a hire purchase, a GST-registered business is generally able to claim the GST on the full purchase price in the return covering the period the agreement begins rather than across the payments, subject to the accountant’s confirmation of the accounting basis used. Under an operating lease the GST is typically claimed on each rental as it is invoiced, again subject to the accountant’s confirmation.
Secure erasure is the business’s obligation rather than the lessor’s, and the return date is fixed whether or not it has been done. Planning it into the changeover rather than discovering it on the return date is the practical answer, and the lease terms are worth reading for what condition equipment must be returned in.
Some lenders will include configuration, data migration and professional services in a facility and others will not. Where they can be included, it keeps the project on one agreement. Where they cannot, they land on operating cash flow at the same time as the hardware arrives, which is worth knowing in advance.
No. A click charge is a service arrangement billing per page with its own term and commonly a minimum monthly volume, and it is a separate commitment from any equipment finance. It is frequently signed at the same time as hardware is supplied, and the two together are the real cost.
It can be, and lenders treat it more like fit-out work than like equipment because it is installed into the premises and cannot be recovered. That means it commonly attracts a deposit, and where the premises are leased the lease term matters for the same reasons it does in hospitality.
Frequently not. On small amounts, the arrangement fee and the higher rate in this class together can outweigh the cash-flow benefit of spreading the cost. Where the purchase is small enough to absorb without straining working capital, paying for it outright is commonly the cheaper and simpler answer.
Related
Medical and dental equipment finance
Practice management systems sit inside a much longer-lived fit-out.
Read onPrinting and signage equipment finance
The other class where technology life sets the term.
Read onCommercial kitchen finance
Where point of sale hardware is usually bought alongside the fit-out.
Read onEnd of term and upgrade options
Matching a term to a refresh cycle, and what happens when they diverge.
Read onPlant and machinery depreciation
How the tax treatment differs on fast-depreciating assets.
Read onAll equipment finance guides
Every machine class covered on this site.
Read onDisclaimer
Financing a machine is a commitment that runs for years, and the repayments come out of the same operating cash flow as everything else. Modelling the weekly and monthly cost against the working-capital position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Equipmentfinance.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.